The Challenge
Across DPS branches, question paper creation and correction consumed days of teacher time every term, with no shared system behind any of it.
Key Challenges
- Hours lost, every term — teachers spent days creating question papers and weeks correcting them, for every class, every section, every term.
- Inconsistent question quality — every teacher built papers alone, with quality varying between teachers and branches and no shared, approved repository to draw from.
- No visibility for management — there was no single view showing which class was falling behind, which branch was slipping, or whether internal tests had even been conducted.
- Marks without meaning — a report could show a student scored 62, but not whether the gap was in recall, understanding, or higher-order thinking.
Our Solution
A Five-Step Loop: Create, Assess, Evaluate, Analyse, Adapt
The platform centralises question creation, automates evaluation, and gives school leadership visibility into exactly how every branch, class, and student is performing — a five-step loop where results feed back into practice and the cycle repeats.
Question Bank
Teachers create questions with AI assistance, each mapped to topic, cognitive level (Bloom's taxonomy), and difficulty. New questions go through an approval workflow before any branch can use them, previous-year board papers are uploaded and tagged for reuse, and every branch draws from — and adds to — the same central, growing bank.
Assessments
Assessments run online (auto-marked objective answers, with proctoring warnings), offline (print-ready papers in board-exam template, marks entered per student), or hybrid (objective online, subjective on paper, combined into one result) — fitting each school's existing exam process rather than forcing a change to it.
AI Evaluation
For subjective answers, students write on paper, photograph and upload their response, and the AI reads, scores, and suggests a mark — in minutes rather than weeks. The teacher reviews and approves the AI's evaluation, or corrects it where needed, before the mark flows into analytics.
Analytics
Performance is analysed across Bloom's taxonomy levels for every student, section, and class — surfacing where recall is strong but application and analysis need work, and showing topic-by-topic attainment so a teacher knows precisely which concepts a class has or hasn't mastered.
Adaptive Practice
Each student's test results generate a personalised practice test targeting exactly their weak areas — no two students receive the same practice test, because no two students have the same gaps. A retest shows the gap closing, visible to both teacher and parent.
Management Dashboard & Multi-Level Reporting
School leadership gets branch, class, section, and individual student performance on one screen — how many internal tests each branch has actually conducted, trend lines rather than one-off scores, and the weakest topics, sections, and cohorts surfaced automatically.
Key Impact
Measured by internal audit across the deployed schools, since adoption.
The platform runs across 13 DPS core schools on the same shared, centrally-managed question bank.
The Customer
Delhi Public School (DPS) Society — the platform is live across 13 of its core schools, with every question validated first internally and then by DPS HODs and senior teachers before reaching students.
Class 12 Board Exam Readiness
The Class 12 programme at DPS runs 250+ questions per chapter across two subjects — Physics and Mathematics — with structure, marking scheme, and difficulty distribution following the board exam pattern.
- Question variants, built in — multiple variants can be framed against each question with updated variables, so practice never runs dry and no two tests repeat.
- Validated twice — every question passes internal academic review first, then DPS HODs and senior teachers validate it before students ever see it.
- Built for the exam that matters — practice mirrors the real board exam structure, not a generic approximation of it.
The Outcomes
The platform turns assessment from a manual, per-teacher burden into a shared, quality-controlled academic asset — with a clear line of sight from a single question to school-wide performance.
Teacher Effort, Sharply Down
Internal assessment creation and correction no longer consume days of teacher time every term.
Deeper Understanding of Every Student
Teachers can see exactly what each student is lacking — recall versus application, specific topic gaps — and address it directly, rather than guessing at it.
One Centralised Academic Asset
Questions, papers, and materials are shared and quality-controlled across all branches, instead of being rebuilt separately by every teacher, every term.
A Single View for Leadership
Branch, class, section, and student performance sit on one dashboard, with trend lines and automatically-surfaced weak spots replacing the previous lack of visibility.
Have a Similar Build in Mind?
Bring us the complexity — we'll bring the production-grade platform.
Talk to the founder